Publishing Ethics Guidelines
Publishing articles in JOURNAL OF EDUCATION: Research and Conceptual is an important part in the development of a coherent and respected knowledge network. This is a direct reflection of the work quality of the authors and the institutions that support it. The articles reviewed support and contain scientific methods. It is therefore important to agree to the standards of ethical behavior expected for all parties involved in publishing: authors, journal editors, publishers, and the public.
Faculty of Education (FIP) Nahdlatul Ulama University as publisher of JOURNAL EDUCATION: Research and Conceptual, responsible to oversee all stages of publishing seriously and acknowledge ethical responsibility and other responsibilities. FIP in addition to committing to ensure that reprint advertisements and other commercial revenue have no impact or effect on editorial decisions, is also committed to assisting communication with other journals and / or publisher managers if deemed useful and necessary.
Briliant Journal Editor is responsible for deciding on published articles. Validation of the work and its significance for researchers and readers should always encourage the decision. Editors may be guided by the journals editorial policy and limited by legal provisions as should be upheld regarding defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. Editors may negotiate with other editors or assessment teams in making this decision.
Editors always rate the text based on their intellectual content without distinction of race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship or political philosophy of authors.
The Briliant Journal Editorial Team should not disclose any information about manuscripts submitted to anyone other than authors, expert editors, and publishers.
Notice and Conflict of Interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in the submitted manuscript shall not be used in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
Contributions to Editorial Decisions
Bestari's Rating helps editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with authors can also help authors improve their writing.
Any assessors selected who feel ineligible to assess the research reported in a script or know that a quick review will be unlikely to have to notify the editor and free him from the assessment process.
Any text received for judgment must be treated as a confidential document. The document should not be shown or discussed with others unless authorized by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity
Assessment must be done objectively. Criticism is personal to the author is not justified. Valuers must express their views clearly with supportive arguments.
Valuers must identify relevant published works that are not quoted by the author. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument has been previously reported must be accompanied by the relevant quotation. An assessor should also ask the editor to pay attention to the similarity or overlap between the assessed text and other published articles.
The author must present an accurate report of the created work and an objective discussion of its significance. The principal data must be accurately represented in writing. A post should include enough detail and references to enable others to repeat the work. Fraudulent or intentionally inaccurate statements are unethical and unacceptable behavior.
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors must ensure that they have written works that are entirely original, and that they have quoted correctly if using the work and / or the words of others.
Double Publishing, Repetition or Simultaneously
A writer in general should not publish a script that essentially explains the same research in more than one major journal or publication. Submitting the same script to more than one journal simultaneously is unethical and unacceptable behavior.
Fair recognition of the work of others must always be given. The authors should cite the influential publications in determining the nature of the work reported.
Authorship should be limited to those who make an important contribution to the reported conception, design, execution or interpretation of the study. All important contributors should be listed as co-authors. If there are others who participate in certain important aspects of the research project, they must be recognized or listed as contributors. The right writer should ensure that all appropriate joint authors are included in the paper, and that all joint authors have seen and approved the final version of the text and have agreed to submit it for publication.
Notice and Conflict of Interest
All authors must notify in their text any financial conflicts or other substantive conflicts that may be allegedly influencing the outcome or interpretation of their manuscript. All financial support for the project should be notified.
A fundamental mistake in published works
If an author finds significant errors or inaccuracies in his or her publications, it is incumbent upon the author to promptly notify the editor or publisher of the journal and work with the editor to retract or correct writing